3D - Printed Patient Specific Instrumentation in Corrective Osteotomy of the Femur and Pelvis: A Review of the Literature

Background: The paediatric patient population has considerable variation in anatomy. The use of Computed Tomography (CT)-based digital models to design three-dimensionally printed patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has recently been applied for correction of deformity in orthopedic surgery. This review sought to determine the existing application of this technology currently in use within paediatric orthopaedics, and assess the potential benefits that this may provide to patients and surgeons. Methods: A review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for published literature, as well as Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov for grey literature. The search strategy revolved around the research question: “What is the clinical impact of using 3D printed PSI for proximal femoral or pelvic osteotomy in paediatric orthopaedics?” Two reviewers, using predetermined inclusion criteria, independently performed title and abstract review in order to select articles for full text review. Data extracted included effect on operating time and intraoperative image use, as well as osteotomy and screw positioning accuracy. Data were combined in a narrative synthesis; meta-analysis was not performed given the diversity of study designs and interventions. Results: In total, ten studies were included: six case control studies, three case series and a case report. Five studies directly compared operating time using PSI to conventional techniques, with two showing a significant decrease in the number of intraoperative images and operative time. Eight studies reported improved accuracy in executing the surgical plan compared to conventional methods. Conclusion: Compared to conventional methods of performing femoral or pelvic osteotomy, use of PSI has led to improved accuracy and precision, decreased procedure times, and decreased intra-operative imaging requirements. Additionally, the technology has become more cost effective and accessible since its initial inception and use

The Impact of COVID-19 on Multidisciplinary Care Delivery to Children with Cerebral Palsy and Other Neuromuscular Complex Chronic Conditions

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented challenges in the care of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and other neuromuscular complex chronic conditions (NCCCs). The purpose of this study is to explore the direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery. From May to August 2020, medical professionals caring for CP and NCCC patients across multiple countries and disciplines completed a self-administered cross-sectional survey comparing practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 79 healthcare workers from eight countries who participated—predominantly pediatric orthopedic surgeons (32%), pediatricians (30%), and pediatric physiatrists (23%)—most of them felt that caring for NCCC patients during the pandemic presented unique difficulties, and they reported a significant decrease in the in-person NCCC clinic volume (p p p = 0.008), and botulinum toxin/phenol injections. Most providers affirmed that institutional guidelines for perioperative emergent/urgent and elective procedures, workplace settings, and technology were modified to accommodate the ongoing public health crisis. The usage of telemedicine significantly increased for NCCC patient visits (p < 0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, many children with NCCCs lost access to routine, multidisciplinary care. Telemedicine became an integral part of communication and management. In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and with the threat of future healthcare disruptions, these data lay the foundation for trending the evolution of healthcare delivery and accelerating best practice guidelines for children with CP and NCCCs

Management of irreducible hip dislocations in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed below 6 months of age

Background: Infants with dislocated irreducible (D/I) hips can be substantially harder to treat than infants with dislocated but reducible hips. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment methods and outcomes for infants with D/I hips in order to optimize management of this difficult patient cohort. Methods: A multicenter prospective hip dysplasia study database was analyzed from 2010 to 2016. Infants aged below 6 months with clinically and radiologically confirmed D/I hips were included in the study. Teratological hips (syndromic/neuromuscular) were excluded. Results: In total, 59 hips in 52 patients were included. All hips were clinically Ortolani negative and radiologically dislocated but irreducible on presentation and had at least 20 months of follow-up. Mean age at diagnosis was 1.9 months (range, 0.1 to 5.9 mo). There were 33 left hips, 12 right hips, and 14 bilateral hips (7 patients). In total, 48 of 59 hips were treated in Pavlik harness. The remainder were treated by alternative braces or primary closed or open reductions. Pavlik treatment was successful in 27 of 48 hips. Pavlik treatment was abandoned in 21 D/I hips, 3 due to femoral nerve palsy and the remainder due to failure to achieve reduction. There was no statistical correlation between Pavlik success and age at diagnosis (P=0.22), patient sex (P=0.61), or bilateral compared with unilateral D/I hips (P=0.07). Left hips were more likely to be successfully reduced in Pavlik harness than right hips (P=0.01). Five complications occurred: 3 patients developed femoral nerve palsy in Pavlik harness, while 2 patients developed avascular necrosis, both after failed Pavlik treatment and subsequent surgery. Conclusions: Pavlik harness treatment has been demonstrated to be a safe and sensible first-line treatment for infants with D/I hips. Left hips were more likely to be successfully reduced in Pavlik harness than right hips, but age, sex, and bilaterality were not correlated. The outcomes demonstrated from this multicentre prospective database inform management of this complex patient cohort. Level of Evidence: Level II-prognostic study: Less-quality prospective study.</p

Effect of positioning error on the Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle and the head-shaft angle compared to the femoral neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often have changes in proximal femoral geometry. Neck-shaft angle (NSA), Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle (HEA) and head-shaft angle (HSA) are used to measure these changes. The impact of femoral rotation on HEA/HSA and of ab/adduction on HEA/HSA/NSA is not well known. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of rotation, ab/adduction and flexion/extension on HEA/HSA/NSA. Radiographic measurements from 384 patients with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-V were utilized. NSA/HSA for affected hips were used with femoral anteversion averages to create three-dimensional models of 694 hips in children with CP. Each hip was rotated, ab/adducted and flexed/extended to simulate malpositioning. HEA/HSA/NSA of each model were measured in each joint position, and differences from correct positioning were determined. Mean HEA error at 20 degrees of internal/external rotations were -0.60 degrees/3.17 degrees, respectively, with the NSA error of -6.56 degrees/9.94 degrees and the HSA error of -3.69 degrees/1.21 degrees. Each degree of ab/adduction added 1 degrees of the HEA error, with no NSA/HSA error. NSA was most sensitive to flexion. Error for all measures increased with increasing GMFCS level. HEA/HSA were minimally impacted by rotation. NSA error was much higher than HEA/HSA in internal rotation and flexion whereas HEA was sensitive to changes in ab/adduction. Given abduction is more easily detectable on imaging than rotation, HEA may be less affected by positioning errors that are common with children with CP than NSA. HSA was least affected by position changes. HEA/HSA could be robust, complementary measures of hip deformities in children with CP.Y